Reżyseria:
Joss WhedonScenariusz:
Joss WhedonZdjęcia:
Seamus McGarveyMuzyka:
Alan SilvestriObsada:
Robert Downey Jr., Jeremy Renner, Scarlett Johansson, Chris Evans, Samuel L. Jackson, Chris Hemsworth, Mark Ruffalo, Clark Gregg, Lou Ferrigno (więcej)VOD (5)
Opisy(1)
W obliczu globalnego zagrożenia Nick Fury, szef międzynarodowej agencji S.H.I.E.L.D. czuwającej nad Światowym bezpieczeństwem, musi skompletować niezwykłą drużynę, która będzie potrafiła stawić czoła bezwzględnemu wrogowi. Iron Man, Thor, Kapitan Ameryka, Hulk, Sokole Oko i Czarna Wdowa po raz pierwszy w historii łączą siły, żeby ochronić Ziemi´ przed inwazją obcych! (CDP.pl)
(więcej)Recenzje (15)
This is war! Though the superheroes here are self-centred weirdos (like the Watchmen), they know what to do when the world needs them and they don’t spend a lot of time thinking it over (unlike Superman). The Nordic bruiser with a hammer and theatrical tendencies, the scientist who turns green from time to time, an action figure brought to life – perfect products of American war propaganda, otherwise known as heroes of the Marvel universe. In line with the target audience, all of them were placed in the nerdy world of Tony Stark (i.e. the protagonist of the franchise’s two commercially most successful titles). The exaggerated pop-culture lens through which Thor and Captain America are viewed protects the film from being too serious, without giving the impression that it’s actually about nothing. Getting the audience emotionally involved in the plot is the main objective of both Whedon, who needs to convince viewers, and Fury, who has to more firmly unite the heroes. This is actually a purely pragmatic goal, a work task, so to speak, so there is no needless sentimental blathering or crying. The death of one of the more important characters ends the self-destructive sizing-up of egos and the plot can then shift to the oft-mentioned war of “us” versus “them” (in the end, the Avengers are ultimately just more weapons of mass destruction, except for the emotions...). This doesn’t mean that the preceding hundred (or however many) minutes didn’t have anything to offer beyond the action scenes and Stark’s one-liners. It is a joy to see how consistently, and without annoying repetition for the thick-headed, the film’s creators use every piece of the provided information, thanks to which we don’t have to figure out for ourselves how any given character knows this and that. The first third of the film contains the gradual, cleverly connected introductions of the individual superheroes (or, more precisely, their introduction to the scene, as most of them were previously introduced in separate films). This is followed by the confrontational second third, where Whedon is clearly in his element – as he did in Firefly, here he conducts a group of individualists onboard one ship). Thanks to their abilities and the film’s budget, only the conflicts that arise between them are significantly weightier. The necessity of suppressing individual idiosyncrasies in favour of the team forms the core of the narrative, as is pointedly illustrated by the last shot with the emblematic A. This involves putting together money (Stark), science (Banner), idealism (Rogers) and moral ethos (Thor), and getting all of the heroes with their different performance styles and the slightly different style of directing of “their” scenes (the Captain with his old-fashioned patriotism; the Hulk, unpredictable like a horror-movie monster; Thor and his theatrical sense of grand tragedy; the conversationally comedic Iron Man) in the same boat (both literally and figuratively). The Avengers’ primary objective is to coordinate these various styles due to the necessity of close combat. I thought that roughly the first two-thirds of the film were very good entertainment, but nothing extraordinary. The final action-packed bacchanalia of the final third, and especially the two indescribable and, for such a massive mainstream film, boldly self-ironic scenes with a pissed-off Hulk prompted me to give not just a satisfactory rating, but an enthusiastic rating. These are pretty shallow reasons, I know – I’ll leave the more sophisticated ones for films that don’t offer attractions like a one-eyed Samuel L. Jackson with a bazooka. Next time, I would like to see less techno-fetishism and more Scarlett Johansson playing the first-ever superheroine who can be taken seriously, because she only feigns fragility and emotional weakness for “work” purposes and has to tame her partner in order to get him back. 90%
()
(mniej)
(więcej)
I went to the 9:30 pm screening, after a very physically exhausting day, and I told myself that if this film manages to entertain me enough to keep me awake, I will give it five stars, and here they are. Now seriously: Avengers is a perfect blockbuster with great sense of humour, incredible chemistry between the characters and amazing action. If you are not looking for the brooding of Batman or the ambition of the Wachowskis (or anything “more”), and you only want good fun at the cinema, you can’t do better than this, it has no competition among the light summer blockbusters. And I’m saying this as someone who didn’t like too much the previous Marvel films and is also not a member of Whedon’s fan club. But there’s one little quibble: Next to the other superheroes, Black Widow and Hawkeye look so out of place and meek. And it’s also weird to see Auntie Robin in SHIELD’s control centre. Hulk/Banner rulez.
()
In the weight class of superheroes who, instead of psychotherapy sessions where they spend two hours figuring out their superhero identity, manage everything by letting their powers speak, preferably in a pretty fierce, loud, and explosive way, the Avengers actually have no competition far and wide. For the first hour, they tease each other with humor, and they use it together against the alien invasion. Kudos to Whedon for dividing up the roles precisely and giving everyone exactly the space they need. Most importantly, it's all done inventively (camera tricks) and it’s imaginatively (funny inserts even into the serious scenes) shot. [My only criticism goes to Loki. Hiddleston isn't so bland anymore because now he’s a charismatic bastard whose character portrayal by the writers falls a little short. Edit: After the second screening, this criticism no longer applies either.]
()
The idea that the film avoids the need to expose itself as a savage, because it will count on viewers familiar with previous films, is completely odd - firstly, a brief exposition of Hawkeye and Natasha is needed, secondly, guys need to compare their steel / divine cocks and find out who has the bigger one... we'll spend about half of the film doing that, and when everyone slaps each other and Captain America teaches us that there's only one God, there's finally a team event. As to how many minutes have passed, it cannot be said that we have complete information about who, what, why and for how much, but once Whedon starts to bend steel in tons and have one shot more spectacular than the last, it actually doesn’t matter. In addition, the characters start spewing one-liners (which unfortunately is a bit worse with the Czech dubbing), the Captain is a little annoying (a little so he can still appear as the good guy) and The Avengers offers exactly why people go and see "Marvel" films. A ballbusting hero party, legible, clear, polished and heavy on tone. You may miss the fact that the whole story is actually a tragically mechanical acceptance of "classical invasive awkwardness" without a fundamental contribution to the mythology of the heroes. The other half is simply pure pleasure from the enormously pompous spectacle. But I still can't shake the impression that nothing happened for half of the film and that we don't know anything more about the characters than before. I am inclined to think that Whedon did the work through careful maneuvering. The entertainment is decent, but as a separate fictional world, it doesn't make much sense - what the first Iron Man and partly Thor were able to do simply shrunk to an exhibition match of stars full of skills competitions. Edit: when I remember the meaty second half and how I also gave Battleship 3 ***, I capitulate and improve my rating :-) [75%]
()
Undemanding, popcorn paint by numbers with clear contours which begin to turn pastel green only after they line up. The Avengers Assemble is quality craftsmanship which unfortunately pays dearly for having just routine action (the first “teaser" part is markedly better than the second) and zero “emotional involvement" of either the viewer or the characters. The whole thing rests on the shoulders of the Stark - Thor - Banner trio and the remaining characters are either a necessary evil (Capt. America) or there to make up numbers. And also a proper baddy is sorely lacking; Loki is outstanding, but he’s more an amusing stooge than an arch-villain. As far as Marvel team productions are concerned, the movie versions of X-Men play in a much higher league.
()
It wasn't until the final credits started rolling that I realized that many people's dreams had just come true. Such as the viewers who sensed from the end of the first Iron Man that this superhero gathering would be epic to the top floor of Stark Tower. Or Joss Whedon, who had been smiling under his (fully geeky) beard for so long until he brought us the essence of himself. And last but not least, all the Whedon fans who supported the creator as an unrivaled storyteller for many years. And then, in one of the most-watched movies of recent years, he proved them absolutely right. The Avengers has Stark's audacity, Cap's courage, Thor's rudeness, and Hulk's titanic power. And they mix everything into a cocktail that is almost impossible to drink in one go. Trying to catch all the quotes, breathtaking action scenes, and meticulously crafted details was simply impossible. It wasn't until the second viewing that I realized that Whedon had thoroughly played with his Marvel toy and then lent it to us, ordinary mortals. The fact that he created a perfectly cinematic comic book, nurturing it minute by minute like a mirror of the genre, is another matter altogether.
()
Everything you would expect and more. Compact fun which, if only for its ratio to the action, makes this twice as good as all of the preceding solo movies. Great chemistry between all of the characters. And the best one is The Hulk. That's my secret, Captain. I'm always angry.
()
Since I’m really only a fan of the guy in the stars and stripes, I didn't have that much fun overall. Yes, Natasha, the recast Bruce, and the loudmouth Tony and his Pepper are not bad. But the whole thing is really just a coloring book in the style of Hulk not giving a crap about anything...
()
Next to Batman and Watchmen, probably the best comic book adaptation. A film full of fun, thrilling action, wit, polished dialogues, self-reflection, and a fantastic cast; everything a first-class blockbuster should have, and with an incredibly precise tuning of the individual ingredients. The last time something similarly perfect within its genre was seen in cinemas was 1996 when Ronald Emmerich directed Independence Day.
()
The Avengers are getting better. The disappointment of the movie theatre is slowly but surely fading thanks to the DVD, and the only problems I really have are with the character of Hawkeye (or rather, his wooden performance) and the fact that the film wants to be endlessly breathtaking at times while making fun of itself, which is a strange game I haven't yet bought into.
()
Yes, the story is sterile and stale, the emotions non-existent and the pace of the narrative is rather erratic, inflated at the end into a charmless presentation of risk-free superhero action. But it doesn't matter, The Avengers is still the chosen one, a film that represents the most basic Marvel idea of colourful comic book characters quite perfectly and surgically accurate. All the clichés are deliberate, skilfully adapted to build an adequately simple plot that best suits this kind of team-ups and that doesn't unnecessarily distract from its primary intention: the entertaining interaction between the diverse heroes, the development of their relationship and the careful interplay with previous (and of course future) instalments of the Marvel Universe. It’s a great COMIC-BOOK movie, with utterly likeable archetypal characters, a charismatic villain, and effects like something out a fan's wildest wet dreams. It doesn't play on civility like Nolan, it plays only for the devoted fans of Tony Stark, Captain America, Thor or the Hulk, and in a perfectly balanced and precise way, as if all those legendary books suddenly came to life and took to the streets of Manhattan, without any questions or delays. The actors are without exception excellent, with the cherry on top in the form of the incredibly sexy Scarlett, before whom, as an enemy I would have knelt down on the spot and desperately cried "Capture me, Lord, capture me!" :)) 90%
()
I went to the cinema thinking I had only seen Thor, so I was afraid I would be indisposed by my ignorance and therefore not enjoy it as much. But the opposite is true! It was absolutely the ultimate action-fun spectacle, packed from top to bottom with perfect audiovisuals and funny lines. I am not particularly fond of Scarlett Johansson, but here she surprised me very pleasantly. Oh, and my favourite Avenger is Iron Man. I didn't even gasp at the 3D projection during the final battle! In short, an American blockbuster with all the trimmings, which is undoubtedly deserves a visit to the cinema, because it is really worth it.
()
During one month, I witnessed that the cinema still has something to amaze with. The film "Prci, prci, prcičky: Školní sraz" completely knocked me out, and now "Avengers". Well, to tell the truth, I enjoyed "Prcičky" even more and I left with a feeling that I usually don't have in the cinema. But the impressions from "Avengers" are very similar. I went to the Czech premiere with subtitles a bit reserved because I was afraid that it would just be a big hype, but the rest would be disappointing. I didn't have to worry. Joss Whedon, the screenwriter, director, but also a comic book creator and especially a comic book enthusiast, probably created his best work. His TV productions are literally cult classics ("Buffy" or "Firefly"), but it will probably be the comic book that he will always be remembered for. He was offered to make a film about the Avengers, the team of the greatest Marvel superheroes, and that's exactly what he did. A great film about great heroes. More: http://www.filmovy-denik.cz/2012/05/avengers-co-dodat.html
()
An entertaining team film whose success is primarily based on funny lines, interactions between the individual Avengers, and rich visual effects. What’s more, it’s no small bit of redemption that Captain America somehow feels more complete in the context of the Avengers, and that his character doesn't come across as comically as he did in The First Avenger. A viewer unfamiliar with the world of the MCU and its previous films need not despair, as The Avengers works quite well as a standalone film. That said, some familiarity with the previous films will certainly enhance the overall experience. If you have a close relationship with the Marvel universe, it's highly unlikely that you won't like The Avengers. From my perspective, it is a slightly overrated film, but that didn't keep me from giving it a fairly high rating, because it's simply entertaining.
()
Honestly, I didn't really expect it to be this great, and I certainly didn't expect to spend half the film laughing at the various flawless innuendos, gags and banter between the characters. But it is definitely not just a comedy. The film also exudes a strong atmosphere and several scenes will become uncompromisingly etched in the viewer's memory. I was amazed at how much it was rather sci-fi from the far-future at some stages. Three cheers for director Whedon, who proved to be a hit and will surely speak many more times in the world of cinema in the future.
()