Opisy(1)

Na skutek serii niewyjaśnionych zjawisk ziemski księżyc wypada ze swojej orbity i obiera kurs kolizyjny z Ziemią. Jeśli dojdzie do zderzenia nasza planeta ulegnie zagładzie. Była astronautka Jo Fowler jest przekonana, że wie, jak nas ocalić, ale ani NASA, ani najważniejsi politycy nie traktują jej poważnie. W tej sytuacji Fowler może liczyć tylko na dwóch ludzi: swojego dawnego kolegę z kosmicznych misji Briana Harpera oraz speca od teorii spiskowych, niejakiego Housemana. Ta trójka bohaterów z przeszłością kładzie na szali całą swoją wiedzę, doświadczenie i życie, by wyruszyć w misję, z której nawet w wypadku powodzenia, mogą nigdy nie wrócić. (Monolith)

(więcej)

Materiały wideo (13)

Zwiastun 11

Recenzje (12)

MrHlad 

wszystkie recenzje użytkownika

angielski The moon has deviated from its orbit and will collide with the Earth in a few weeks. Only two former astronauts and one annoying conspiracy theorist can save the world, but they have no idea what awaits them in space. Roland Emmerich rips himself off and makes another disaster movie, but one that is a shadow of Independence Day or 2012. It's just not very entertaining this time around, which makes how stupid it all is stand out that much more. ()

EvilPhoEniX 

wszystkie recenzje użytkownika

angielski It has a bit of an Independence Day 2 feel. I like Emmerich, he handles the VFX attractions well, but the rest is noticeably inferior to the competition. I found everything here to be incredibly rushed forward (it's quite a ironic that Don't Look Up was able to present the threat in a much more interesting, exacerbated and intense way), which is a shame, I believe with a strong background this could have been very good. At the same time it's a shame that Emmerich had to mix in artificial intelligence and aliens, in other circumstances I would have welcomed it, but here the threat of the moon alone would have been enough to give the whole thing a more serious feel. It's cheesy and quite entertaining, but it's a shame that the destruction itself takes a while. 5.5/10. ()

Reklama

Lima 

wszystkie recenzje użytkownika

angielski This is so heavenly stupid that it's kind of beautiful. This movie is about 60 years late, and that's actually a good thing. I felt like I was watching vintage sci-fi from the 1950s again, only that Roland goes much, much further with the stupidity. In the 1950s, during the Golden Age of science fiction, these pieces were made like Bata's trainers, nothing makes sense to today's viewer, but you still have fun and smile because you can feel the sincere effort to make a good film. Probably like Edward D. Wood Jr. when he was hanging models of flying saucers on string, Roland has the technical side of the craft down pat, but the boys are on the same page in terms of message. Emmerich is a genre on his own. I don’t want to watch it again, but it was a guilty pleasure. ()

Marigold 

wszystkie recenzje użytkownika

angielski In terms of price and performance, Roland Emmerich has already destroyed the planet several times in a much better way and with a nicer humanistic furor. This incel-conspiracy vision is fine as long as it plays by the rules of a disaster film, but then my brain was skipping out on this attempt at lobotomized sci-fi. It should have ended up on Netflix, because I haven't seen such ugly green-screens on the big screen in a long time. Being able to put the laundry in the washing machine and look out the window would only have added to the film. I don’t expect much from Emmerich, but certainly something more fun than Moonfall. ()

POMO 

wszystkie recenzje użytkownika

angielski In Moonfall, there is not even a trace of anything that made last year’s The Tomorrow War, a B-movie in the same genre, so great (inventive work with clichés, sincere emotions, nice visual stylization). Emmerich disappeared into a black hole. This can’t be his movie. Or maybe he's just realizing that he has nothing left to say after 2012. An Asylum screenplay with an A-list cast. I still can’t believe that I saw Patrick Wilson and Halle Berry reciting that dialogue. ()

Galeria (91)