Głębia strachu

The best thing about Underwater is Kristen Stewart, and that’s not an exaggeration. The unusual image suited her speech very well. And the pop song in the closing credits is confirmation that the main intention was to draw in her fans. Atmospherically, the film works quite well and the way it dynamically draws the viewer into the plot is outstanding, but it gradually runs out of gas and shuffling around on the place is supposed to unleash the mediocre monsters. The motif of the environmental threat of drilling into the ocean floor isn’t exactly innovative and there is nothing here to make it anything special, so it just remains a worn-out cliché. (22.01.2020)

Kristen Stewart with her deadpan expression is completely out of her depth here as an actress, though the film itself is better than you’d expect from the behind-the-scenes rumors that made the rounds before it premiered. The cinematography is solid and properly gritty – to the point where you tell yourself: hey, this is what it might actually look like after a disaster ten kilometers below the sea. Unfortunately, this level of veracity means that when the protagonists leave the base for the open sea, it’s hard to make anything out in the dark waters; the chaotic editing doesn’t help. The Lovecraftian scares at the end didn’t do it for me either. (02.04.2020)

If there was a glut of underwater monster horror films in the cinemas, I may have complained that Underwater has poorly drawn characters, that the space and the action are sometimes hard to navigate, and that it doesn’t bring anything new to the sub-genre. But given that the last in any way comparable competition is 1989’s Leviathan, I won’t be a douchebag. And it’s also nice to go to watch a horror flick with a sea monster and get an excellently crafted genre film that doesn’t waste time and jumps right into an intensive action, basically the moment the lights in the theatre go out. The money can be seen. Eubank has once again proven that they can manage the visual aspect of filmmaking with panache. In terms of ambition, however, Underwater is probably the most mundane of their filmography, but this is certainly to the benefit of their cause. But for me, the main plus are the best designed monsters far and wide. (10.01.2020)

An entertaining underwater horror b-movie that paces and looks great from start to finish. However, when it slows down a bit at times, it turns out that all the characters are terribly simple and flat and you don't really care who lives to see the end credits. Most of the time, though, it has a very solid pace and the result is an above average underwater variation on Alien. If you're missing something similar at the cinema, definitely don't resist Underwater. Don't expect a revolution, but the above average craftsmanship isn't lacking either. (10.01.2020)

A promising introduction. Although rather than a film, it resembles effective cinematics in a survival game that I would like to play, but it does fulfill its purpose. I am quite susceptible to underwater anxiety, so as long as something is going on, I'll enjoy a very flimsy expedition and a high amount of deliberately raw filming. But then… uh-oh. The alternative tagline should read: there is nothing to see under the water, which I would have preferred if it hadn't been accompanied by stupid and terribly confusing editing. It prevents a person from enjoying the underwater terror, because here and there, it is not clear where you are who you are actually watching. In addition, the characters are such dull, forgettable reflections. The perpetrator of terror has about five different forms and it is not entirely clear where the creators are trying to take us - to alternative underwater biology, or full-blown sci-fi horror? The conclusion rushes with the answer in the form of Lovecraft kohlrabi and I have to laugh. Mixing so many good things into such a dull goulash truly requires giant blenders. Unfortunately for Underwater, the film is full of them. It doesn't even work as a fun one-time watch. It’s about as much fun as snorkeling in a pond. Regarding B-movie flooding, I will continue to prescribe the beautiful Verne misstep, which has Balls. (11.01.2020)

William Eubank has made an homage to 80's underwater horror but it's nothing more than B-movie entertainment. The film is nicely shot, the monsters are awesome and it moves along very quickly, which are major pluses, but it bothered me that it shuffles its feet in places a lot of times and the climax didn't really engage at all – many times I didn't even notice who died and how, as the film was mostly in the dark and that bothered me quite a bit. The suspense and atmosphere didn't really work for me, and the monsters are only shown at the end, which didn't please me much either. With a more interesting filmmaker this could have been a modern day Event Horizon, this way it's just a fine addition to the genre, but it soon fizzles out. 6.5/10. (18.02.2020)

I think this would make a cool video game. A pumped-up, slightly B-movie-ish sci-fi horror flick set in the Mariana Trench, where there isn’t much time for thinking. Because of that, however, the protagonists unfortunately have absolutely no character basis, so the viewer doesn’t really care that much when they kick the bucket. And that’s a bit of a shame. Stewart’s acting is actually really good and just a few brief flashbacks would have been enough to make the relationship between her and the captain a little deeper or something. The production design and visual effects are otherwise first-class; the station, the costumes and even Cthulhu look seriously good. (28.03.2020)

Underwater is most often compared to Alien (and rightly so, as some of the scenes are more than inspired), but I think the filmmakers would have been happy if it was also compared to Gravity. Indeed, several times they try to evoke the mood of the first film mentioned, several times the second, but somehow it doesn't come together and it's all only half as interesting. A number of scenes have a nice gloomy atmosphere but aren't very suspenseful. Some scenes are really well acted, like the one where a stressed Kristen Stewart recounts what happened to Vincent Cassel. And the final super-monster scene is fine too, although we don't really enjoy it and everything ends as expected. I was hoping it would be a little better. (11.01.2020)

This 1980s premise in a modern audiovisual conception is not bad, and it’s actually helped by the casting of Kristen Stewart, who might not be Ripley, but she doesn’t look half bad with a boyish haircut and in underwear. Another good thing is the absence of exposition and the breakneck pace that promises what is probably the most honest horror since Event Horizon, this time, though, in an attractive and nonetheless atmospheric submarine setting. But then there are things that are not downright horrible, but due to the darkness itself and the wild editing, you can barely see what’s happening in about 60% of the scenes, and the most action-packed passage is followed by a lull that irreparably pushes all the tension below the level of the excellent beginning. What is funny at times, too, is the total disregard of otherwise clearly defined physical laws, but that is something I can forgive as part of the premise. The monster is creepy, though a little too sci-fi (something terrifying could live at a depth of 11 km, but it should be more realistic) and the ending is fine. It’s ideal as something to watch with friends, but that’s all the praise I can give it. 65% (01.04.2020)

Although Underwater is a mish-mash of everything we've seen many times in other  horror movies set under-the-sea (DeepStar Six, Leviathan) or in space, like a taster for the genre in which something constantly happens from beginning to end, it still kind of works. The screenplay features perhaps all the clichés of similar stories and contains a lot of holes in logic that could easily be unraveled if you want - but I don't want to. I guess I somehow let myself be lulled into following the movie for the revelation of the monster at the end, which seems to have fallen out of the stories of an unnamed author. The more one thinks about it, the more one thinks of how the movie could have been better if it had been worked on in a few places. Also, the reluctance of the creators to let the viewer breathe in silence on a dark wave after the end of the movie clearly undermined my experience, instead, they forcibly pasted a disgusting modern pop song over the end credits. This movie balances around a gray average. (11.01.2020)

Underwater mixes elements of 80's horror films like Leviathan, The Thing and Aliens, but with more advanced visual effects to compensate for the fact that it is essentially a compilation of the aforementioned films. The look of the underwater monsters had something to it, and I have to commend the makers for having a little surprise at the end in that regard. Throughout the story, you are more afraid of the "endless" atmosphere of the depths than the monsters themselves, which I personally prefer, but that's not to say that the typical scares don't work. Last but not least, on the whole I was glad that Kristen Stewart doesn’t talk much – less is more. (12.01.2020)

I resent the general unwillingness to adapt and enjoy these purely physical genre films, especially when there's so much effort, skill, and a challenging but successful creative vision behind them. Underwater has ambitiously thrown a huge number of obstacles in its path – much of the film takes place in complete darkness, in a confined space, with disoriented characters wearing identical spacesuits. And yet it manages to maintain clarity in even the most challenging conditions without helping itself to any disruption of the original setup. It manages to do this in particular thanks to the shape of those diving suits, which since they have to withstand incredible pressure, look like something out of Warhammer, so that the characters who are otherwise piled on top of each other in these suits are actually farther apart and thus easily distinguishable. Navigating the positioning of the characters around the set, how they communicate, and what they are looking at, is also helped along by the sharp spot lights next to their helmets. And because of these kinds of different solutions to the challenges the film has set in its path, I enjoyed watching it immensely. Even if, from a technical point of view, I could have been grinning cynically the whole time (the highlight, of course, is when you can monitor your surroundings with 3D modelling in half a minute with one program and then, with a swipe of your finger, overload the nuclear core that the whole station runs on). Small bonuses, then, for the fact that the film is set in what is, for me, the most terrifying place on planet Earth and for the fact that Kristen Stewart’s character definitively tops the list of the most compelling movie characters since the invention of stone. I rank William Eubank alongside Christopher Smith, Christophe Gans, and Jaume Collet-Serra as one of my favorite genre directors. (09.04.2020)

The opening half hour literally blew me away. It was very realistic and really exciting. Gradually, however, the secrets and mysteries diminished until treated to an unpleasant déjà vu in the form of an underwater intruder. Which is certainly a shame, because the subject had much more potential than the filmmakers managed to tap. (60%) (17.10.2022)