Lima

There hasn’t been such a good crime film since Fincher’s Zodiac. It has all the necessary ingredients mixed in a balanced ratio: a perfectly bleak, brooding atmosphere (cinematographer Deakins once again reigns supreme), acting sure-footedness where once again – as in Fincher's masterpiece – I loved Gyllenhaal with his beleaguered police figure, and a perfect screenplay that looks like an adaptation of an ingeniously written novel by one of the Nordic authors who reign supreme in the detective fiction genre today. And on top of that the shit-phile called verbal gave it 1*, so I don't know what better recommendation you'd want :o)

The events of the story are engaging and interesting, but unfortunately the film is completely brought to its knees by one major problem: Ashton Kutcher's lacklustre and dull performance; he simply can’t handle drama. I don’t know how Jobs was in real life, but I’m very sure he wasn’t a cold fish with the same set expression and slight smile. What's more, the film doesn't make it so clear what Jobs struggled with most – himself, his almost morbid perfectionism and uncompromising egotism, where he was willing to go over dead bodies – but in Kutcher’s interpretation he looks more like a puppy who occasionally barks and bares its teeth. All those casually thrown situations don’t really explain what Jobs’s greatness was. Better read Walter Isaacson's book, it is infinitely more engaging and dramatic.

I'm not a fan of categorical attributions or condemnations that label something as the best/worst, because these evaluations are always subjective and often out of context. But in this case I’m pretty sure, this is absolutely the most embarrassing film in the history of Czechoslovak cinema. For those interested in film history, it’s the most striking example of the normalization "cinema of oblivion" of the first half of the 1970s. Even the Communist approvers of the time shook their heads in disbelief at this masterpiece, and even though it blatantly referred to the events of the "Prague Spring of 1968" (which must have suited them), withdrew it from the cinemas and did not allow it to be shown on TV, because even for them it was too stupidly absurd and unwatchable. Even as study material, it’s for hardened masochists.

This ain’t for the killjoys. I'm not surprised at the high ratings on www.badmovies.org. This is a cheaper version of Star Wars, or Star Trek, which the film pokes fun at and above all makes fun of itself. Infused with insight and self-deprecating humour, it stays in the final rating for most of its duration in a slightly above average, as a pleasant entertainment, the fourth star definitely decided by the last quarter of an hour, when the filmmakers break loose and the phenomenon of the space-time paradox, popularly used several times in the Star Trek series, reaches such level of absurdity that I said to myself with a disbelieving look and an amused smile, "You don’t see this kind of crap every day." And that's appreciated :o)

A film so epic, monstrously megalomaniacal and auteurishly stupid that it fills me with horror and admiration at the same time. After the Oscar harvest of The Deer Hunter, Cimino lost his judgement and took on the role of a filmmaker who can afford anything, regardless of cost and creative power, but at this point I, as a fan of the sensibly narrated, megalomaniac productions that were made especially in the 1950s and 60s, can only be pleased. This is the last Mohican of good old Hollywood, this is the film that made history, regardless of (or perhaps because of, depending on your point of view) the label of "the biggest movie flop of all time" (watching the Criterion Collection Blu-ray version, 219 min.).

Towards the end it plays too much for effect and the slow motion shots are like a fist on the eye, but I still have to give full marks to a film that accurately names the ills of our time of alienation, loss of identity and dependence on the internet; a time of forming virtual relationships through bullshit social networks. No other film in recent memory has made it clearer that the internet is a good servant but an evil master.

It is amusing to read the incomprehensible criticism here about "failed crime movie" and "weak comedy". Škvorecký and Suchý were after something completely different. This film is a critique of a regime that bends law and justice to suit itself, which is especially evident in the last act, where it completely switches genres. And we should take into account the era in which it was made: the tense time of the autumn of 1968, in the fearful anticipation of things to come (purges in artistic circles, forced emigration), which is bloody evident in the result. That's why the humour often misses the mark, the actors are clueless and the slightly gloomy atmosphere of a funeral home pervades the film. But thanks for the nice songs and Eva Pilarová, who looks really hot here.

Vávra plays on the poetic and the New Wave, but the result is rather awkward – you can't teach an old dog new tricks. But I can't deny the beautiful cinematography, as well as the great Jaromír Hanzlík, he was a distinctive type already in his early youth.

Dear film fans, those of you who missed a story and sophisticated dialogue raise your hands. No, not you Pomo, you always raise your hand. Anyone else? Anyone? Now seriously. Cuarón has created a technological marvel that will make you forget to eat overpriced popcorn and might even make you realise that our life-giving ball called Earth, floating through deadly space, is truly unique and beautiful. Only the 3D seemed unrecognizable and unnecessary, for that we have only the master of three-dimensional experiences Jim Cameron.

The most underrated blockbuster of the year. Admittedly uneven in pace, with occasional dullness in the middle passage and some forced humour courtesy of a goofy Depp, but otherwise full of playfulness, likeable exuberance, unprecedented production design and top-notch choreography in several action passages. And please, screw the fact that Depp is just recycling Jack Sparrow, I’m not going to deny excellent craftsmanship because of that.