Kochanice króla

The Other Boleyn Girl is enjoyable, fast and not boring, but the attribute “historical film with an all-star cast” is invalid. Rather, it is another (alongside Elizabeth: The Golden Age) modern period farce that jumps from one event to the next just to accelerate the pace and only secondarily focuses on the story and its characters. Justin Chadwick presents intrigues, love, betrayal, and manipulation in the manner of Cruel Intentions rather than a serious period drama. The Other Boleyn Girl looks like a serious movie and is really impressive only in those few moments when Ana Torrent (Queen Catherine) is in front of the camera. (29.10.2008)

No naive infatuation in the fight against difficult times, no fateful confession that will forever remain in you. The king's favor takes the path of uncompromisingness, where romantic ideals are suffocated in the bud, love promises end with only one resolute command, and a child is not always just the fulfillment of a relationship. Desperate romantics, therefore, must get a magnifying glass for the projection, to find their own and be able to leave satisfied, but those who tune in to the wave of intrigues and desperate efforts will undoubtedly enjoy this royal spectacle. (09.11.2008)

The story of the Boleyn siblings, and it’s also incidentally about Henry VIII. It’s an excellent treatment that opens up the path to The Tudors series in a great way. For viewers who aren’t fans of history, they may just see some unexpected dramatic twists. ;) (26.02.2010)

The performances are very interesting, especially Natalie Portman, who plays both the delicate Scarlett and the masculine Banu. However, The Other Boleyn Girl is surprisingly a dry historical drama with an unusual editing for a historical film. It does have the traditional trademarks like several poetic shots of wheat waving in the wind. The cinematography is beautiful, the work with lighting is excellent, but otherwise this film, despite its attractive look at first glance, comes across as a rather uninteresting fresco. It needed a more experienced director. (08.04.2009)

The cleverly written story benefits mainly from the pair of actresses in the main roles and plays with the viewer in such a way that first the first one is likeable, then the second, then both, then a moment later neither of them... And finally... Let’s just say it's worth it. In the Scarlett X Natalie battle, the latter did it for me this time (which I was surprised by), Eric Bana is fit to be the king, and Kristin Scott Thomas' mother is clearly the leader of the supporting characters. I praise the costumes, the cinematography and the music, but I don't praise the almost two-hour runtime, which seemed unnecessarily long about fifteen minutes before the end. Still giving it four stars, though. (30.08.2010)

When historical events are being filmed, I would expect a little more from such a film. I don't know exactly what, but most likely it would be lavishness, pomposity. I didn't receive anything like that. The costumes are not particularly interesting; they are much more beautiful in the following film, which disappointed me in terms of grandeur no less. "The Favor of the King" is a film about important events in English history. In addition to the king's first separation from the Church and the establishment of the Anglican Church, which is subordinate to royal power, it was also a very bloody period in English history. After all, the queen ended up on the stake many times. However, it wasn't that many times. Anna Boleyn, however, earned her fate with alleged incest with her own brother. The reason was supposedly her attempt to become pregnant again after a miscarriage, so that the king would not be disappointed. Henry VIII is a king whose story is a frequent subject for film adaptations or dramatizations. It doesn't have to be just a tragedy, as in the case of the film "The Favor of the King," but his fate is often turned into comedy. "The Wives of Henry VIII" is a great comedy at the Otakar Vávra Theater. The film lacks emotion, which is a fundamental problem for such a strong story. Natalie Portman doesn't act badly, neither does Scarlett Johansson, but neither of them has as much space as they deserve. It's as if the director actually didn't know who to focus on first. And so the most time on the screen is spent by Eric Bana, as King Henry III. Yes, let's not lie, this "actor" once again proves that he got into Hollywood because of his appearance, which is quite terrible in this case. It's a historical drama that doesn't leave any significant impact on you. Sad. More: http://www.filmovy-denik.cz/2012/12/sherrybaby-lets-dance-unesena.html (03.03.2013)