Wrath of the Titans
Reżyseria:
Jonathan LiebesmanZdjęcia:
Ben DavisMuzyka:
Javier NavarreteObsada:
Sam Worthington, Liam Neeson, Edgar Ramirez, Danny Huston, Toby Kebbell, Rosamund Pike, Ralph Fiennes, Bill Nighy, Matt Milne, Lily James, Sinéad Cusack (więcej)VOD (3)
Opisy(1)
Dziesięć lat po pokonaniu potwornego Krakena Perseusz (Worthington) — półbóg, syn Zeusa (Neeson) — wiedzie w małej wiosce spokojne życie rybaka i samotnie wychowuje swojego dziesięcioletniego syna Heliusa. Tymczasem między bogami a tytanami toczy się walka o władzę. Bogowie, bardzo osłabieni brakiem oddania ludzi, tracą panowanie nad uwięzionymi tytanami i ich okrutnym przywódcą, Kronosem, ojcem władających od wielu lat braci: Zeusa, Hadesa (Fiennes) oraz Posejdona (Danny Huston). Trójka ta dawno już obaliła swojego potężnego ojca, pozostawiając go na pastwę losu w ponurej otchłani Tartaru, lochu znajdującego się głęboko w mrokach krainy podziemia. (Warner Bros. PL)
(więcej)Materiały wideo (18)
Recenzje (14)
Robert Graves must still be turning in his grave, but perhaps not so frequently this time. Because you have to admit that Wrath of the Titans provokes no wrath at all in its viewers and so is certainly a lot more bearable and better than Clash of the Titans. However, more bearable and better doesn’t mean that it’s bearable and good.
()
A CGI ride that the creators of the old Clash of the Titans would take a single look at before spitting and stomping on the copy of the film with rage. Because everything not done in the old-fashioned way here is done digitally. And these digital orgies are really brutal. Maybe this is the reason that this film is terribly crazy, bordering on insane. It is, however, entertaining, and suited for our times. It’s actually just as dumb as the first instalment, with the added bonus of the camera that barely allows the audience to see a thing, but the authors still think that it creates the feeling of being there with the gods and fighting side by side with Sam Worthington. This made me knock one star off my rating.
()
Sure, if I wanted to spit on it, I could go into any minute of runtime and pull out at least five things to criticize. However, the entire time Liebesman follows the rule "I’m not very good at this, but at least it will be noisy and fast," not letting down for even a brief moment. This can't be said of his predecessor, so no more long yawns or bleeding eyes. Worthington is fine, but the divine lineup is simply divine. PS: I would very much like to see some more serious stuff from this director.
()
I'd love to be a screenwriter in Hollywood and write stuff like this (there were four of them in this film), it would be easier to make a living than collecting welfare. It's even dumber than the previous one, which is to be expected. The only thing I wonder about this crap is how many times Neeson and Fiennes said to each other on set, "God, what kind of crap did we get ourselves into again."
()
Wrath of the Titans is a dumb megalomaniacal flick that is packed with action from beginning to end. It also features the best monsters you’ve seen in a movie in the past few years. Due to its one-dimensional characters, however, the potential of its elite British actors is wasted. The film is flat, but visually effective and full of quicksilver energy. Such energy in fact that it might be too much for viewers who would appreciate a bit of downtime with some emotions or – God forbid – some kind of a message. For its target audience, however, it is much more satisfying than the first instalment. If the first movie had looked like that, the second one would have attracted more people to the cinemas.
()
Reklama