Sztuka życia

I'm glad I occasionally get to these older movies because I have to say, in terms of acting, they're worth it. And this time, story-wise as well. There are ideas being discussed here that seem quite progressive for their time, although in terms of sexuality, it's not particularly shocking. The central trio entertains, and that's the main thing. (02.11.2016)

Noël Coward's modern play was transferred from Broadway to film the year after it opened. Although the subject was attractive and interesting then and now, I don't think it is necessary to bow down in any way to this particular Lubitsch routine. The film transcription is clumsy, just as the transcription of plays is today. The sweet and spicy theme is the only thing that could raise the corners of your mouth to smile. But that's all. March and Coop act as if they themselves were on stage, but the film needs no such simulations. They were both much more mature actors by then. And what about Miriam Hopkins? She gets great dialogue, but she recites it like a naive fifth-former. I understand that she's great as a porcelain model who looks good in fancy costumes, but there was nothing here resembling an acting orgy. So who should I recommend it to? Perhaps only those who are not familiar with the films of the 1930s and will enjoy this. The pre-code era offers far greater treats. "It's true we have our gentleman's agreement. But I unfortunately am no gentleman." (31.05.2020)