Reżyseria:
Patrick TatopoulosZdjęcia:
Ross EmeryMuzyka:
Paul HaslingerObsada:
Rhona Mitra, Steven Mackintosh, Bill Nighy, Michael Sheen, Shane Brolly, Tania Nolan, Kevin Grevioux, Elizabeth Hawthorne, Craig Parker, Peter Tait (więcej)VOD (1)
Opisy(1)
Trzecia odsłona słynnej sagi, będąca jednocześnie prequelem poprzednich części, śledzi początki trwającej od wieków krwawej waśni arystokratycznych wampirów, znanych jako Handlarze Śmiercią i ich byłych niewolników Lykanów. W czasach wczesnego średniowiecza, młody Lykan o imieniu Lucian (Michael Sheen) wyłania się jako potężny przywódca, który gromadzi i jednoczy wilkołaki, aby powstały przeciwko Viktorowi (Bill Nighy), okrutnemu królowi wampirów, który uczynił z nich niewolników. W walce przeciwko armii Handlarzy Śmiercią i o wolność dla Lykanów, do Luciana dołącza jego sekretna kochanka Sonja (Rhona Mitra), by razem z nim zmienić historię. (Imperial Cinepix)
(więcej)Materiały wideo (2)
Recenzje (8)
When vampires and werewolves go at each other's throats in a medieval world, the love between two of them is definitely not going to have a nice ending. This prequel to Len Wiseman's action horror film offers very chaotic action, mediocre visual effects and a feeling that it doesn't belong in the cinema.
()
The idea of making the whole series as just one big flashback isn't entirely out of place, and I got quite a kick out of the acting. Rhona Mitra has been good since Season 3 of Nip/Tuck, I've been considering The Gates because of her. I'm always happy to see Elizabeth Hawthorne outside of series production, and the biggest hit of Rise of the Lycans was of course the "find all the footage with Craig Parker" game.
()
As a prequel, it's not completely bad. Rhona Mitra was a safe bet and the rest of the cast is more or less consistently good. What didn't work as well in the third vampire adventure was the atmosphere and overall visual execution. After all, darkness and booming music work better in a modern city at night, where it's much more appealing and attractive, rather than in a medieval castle surrounded by walls and catapults. The special effects weren't particularly impressive either, but from the first moments, it was clear that they were cutting corners wherever possible. There are a few original scenes (with the wooden spears) and the final quarter of the film surprised me with its unexpected twists, which fit well into the story. If there's a fourth one, I wonder what it will be about. It feels like a closed trilogy that barely meets the standards of quality.
()
This is bad. It’s lost its mojo. I quite liked the previous two installments (the first more than the second), but I didn't like this one. Boring. And the dubbing?! Why did she call him “darling"? And why was he wearing the same coat he had been wearing several centuries before? And what was the black guy doing there? And why....? Never mind. A weak installment, a bad script, and overall a big disappointment.
()
Wiseman may be a tragedian who steals from where he can, but against Tatopoulos he is a virtuoso. Or I’ll film lightning, raindrops, sword swings, someone’s face, and a splash of blood on the wall, cram it all into a single second, and repeat it several times in a row... and now I have an action scene! As an added bonus, it will have a demented plot that wouldn't even succeed as a non-committal B-movie, bored actors (Nighy’s demonicness and Rhona's sex appeal nowhere to be found), the absence of a single moment worth remembering, or at least one to help you snap out of stereotypical lethargy. And this is the result. This is the most moronic thing with dudes in leather rags holding swords since Pathfinder, and it puts its two predecessors to shame, though we could actually say that it’s not really even possible anymore.
()
Reklama